THEBUSINESSBYTES
BUREAU
BHUBANESWAR,
MARCH 26, 2026
In a significant
political development reflecting the pulse of public sentiment, the Odisha
Legislative Assembly Secretariat has officially informed members about the
withdrawal of the contentious amendment bills that had proposed a steep
threefold increase in salaries and allowances for legislators and ministers.
The move follows
formal communication from Assembly Secretary Satyabrata Rout, stating that
Parliamentary Affairs Minister Dr Mukesh Mahaling has expressed his intention
to seek leave to withdraw the amendments, which had triggered widespread debate
across the state. The proposals, passed in December 2025, had drawn
considerable attention due to the magnitude of the increase and the timing of
the decision.
The legislation
slated for withdrawal includes amendments related to the salaries, allowances,
and pensions of MLAs, the Speaker, Deputy Speaker, and members of the Council
of Ministers. The revised provisions had proposed a substantial jump in
remuneration, with the Chief Minister’s monthly pay projected to rise from ₹98,000 to
nearly ₹3.74 lakh, while legislators’
salaries were expected to increase from around ₹1 lakh to approximately ₹3.45
lakh.
The proposed hike had
positioned Odisha’s lawmakers among the highest-paid legislators in the
country, sparking public discourse on fiscal priorities and governance
accountability. The issue resonated strongly among citizens and civil society
groups, who questioned the necessity of the increase at a time when economic
prudence remains a key concern.
The political debate
gained further momentum when Naveen Patnaik, president of Biju Janata Dal and
former Chief Minister, wrote to Chief Minister Mohan Charan Majhi announcing
his decision to forego the enhanced salary and allowances meant for the Leader
of Opposition. His gesture was widely interpreted as a signal of restraint and
responsibility, intensifying public discussion around the issue.
Subsequently, voices from both the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party and the opposition BJD urged the Chief Minister to revisit the decision, indicating rare convergence across political lines on the need for reconsideration. The appeals underscored broader concerns about balancing governance priorities with public expectations, ultimately shaping the government’s decision to step back from the proposed revisions.
The withdrawal of the bills is being seen as a politically calibrated response to public opinion, reinforcing the role of democratic feedback in influencing policy direction and legislative decisions in the state.