THEBUSINESSBYTES BUREAU

BHUBANESWAR, JULY 2, 2026

Researchers from KIIT Deemed to be University (KIIT-DU) have published a significant paper in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet, underscoring the need to incorporate age-related tumour biology into the evaluation of artificial intelligence (AI)-based breast cancer screening.

The publication argues that integrating biological differences across age groups into AI-assisted mammography assessments could provide a more accurate measure of the technology’s effectiveness in detecting breast cancer.

The article, authored by Dr. Pratap Kumar Jena, Associate Professor, Sabyasachi Shukla, PhD Scholar, and Dr. Ramya Pinnamaneni, Director of the School of Public Health at KIIT, contends that AI-powered mammography tools should be assessed not only for their technological performance but also for the biological variations in tumour growth across different age groups. Such an approach, the researchers say, would generate stronger evidence on the clinical effectiveness of breast cancer screening.

The KIIT team presented these observations in response to findings from the Swedish MASAI (Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence) trial, one of the world’s largest studies evaluating AI in breast cancer screening. While the trial concluded that AI-assisted screening detected more cancers and outperformed the conventional double-reading method by radiologists, the KIIT researchers believe the study did not sufficiently account for age-related differences in tumour biology.

According to the researchers, breast cancer does not progress uniformly across all age groups. Tumours in younger women often grow more rapidly, whereas those in older women tend to develop more slowly and remain detectable for longer durations.

This variation in the “window of detectability” can significantly influence the perceived performance of AI systems, potentially making them appear either more or less effective than they actually are.

 “If AI-based screening assessments do not account for age-related differences in tumour growth and the window of detectability, estimates of screening effectiveness may be incomplete,” said Dr. Pratap Kumar Jena. “Integrating biological factors into AI evaluation frameworks could improve predictive accuracy and reduce errors in assessing AI performance.”

The publication marks another notable scholarly contribution by KIIT researchers to the growing global discourse on AI-assisted healthcare. Earlier this year, the same research team published a correspondence in The Lancet Digital Health, highlighting key methodological considerations in evaluating AI-assisted mammography, including the importance of accounting for the preclinical “window of detectability” (or sojourn time) and clarifying critical screening metrics.

Building on their earlier work, the researchers have recommended that future AI-supported mammography studies incorporate mathematical models that account for age-related variations in cancer growth. They believe such an approach would enable a more accurate assessment of AI’s true clinical value and support healthcare systems in making better-informed breast cancer screening decisions for women across different age groups.